An often-overlooked element contributes to the 49ers’ delay in appointing a new defensive coordinator. This is what
it is.
An often-overlooked factor contributes to the 49ers’ delay in naming a new defensive coordinator. This is what it is.
However, one issue has been neglected in the 49ers’ quest for a defensive coordinator. It undoubtedly contributes to
the length of time it takes to hire someone. The factor is continuity. Whoever the 49ers hire as defensive coordinator
is expected to stay for at least two to three seasons.
The 49ers don’t want to hire someone who, despite being a perfect fit, leaves after just one season. If this happens,
the 49ers will be looking for a new defensive coordinator for the third year in a row. Kyle Shanahan does not want to
deal with that situation again. I believe that is why employing some of the big names, if they are even interested, such
as Bill Belichick and Mike Vrabel, is not ideal.
Sure, they both would make fantastic coordinators, but they won’t be around for more than a season. The 49ers are
searching for continuity, and rightly so. Playing musical chairs as defensive coordinator will be difficult and may
result in some regression on that side of the ball. It is preferable for the 49ers to seek someone who they believe will
be on the team for the next few years.
Given the individuals they’ve interviewed, it’s likely that each of them will stay for at least a few seasons. I seriously
doubt Brandon Staley, Nick Sorensen, Daniel Bullocks, or David Merritt will depart after a year. However,
determining that is not straightforward, which I am sure is part of the reason for the 49ers’ slow search. They most
likely also contemplated a “one-and-done” coach.
This is why they need to take their time. Whatever is best for the club, including taking the time to locate a coach
who will be the defensive coordinator beyond next season, is the proper way.
